Meet our
characters:
Kathryn –
New CEO — low-tech, team builder
Jeff –
Business Development — Venture capital raiser, recruiting, textbook, protocol,
fears failure
Mikey –
Marketing — Talker, complainer, victim
(FIRED)
Martin –
Chief Technologist — Founder, inventor,
quiet, laptop always opened, avoids conflict, sarcastic
JR –
Sales — Willing, never rude, flaky,
skilled (QUIT)
Carlos –
Customer Support — Speaks little, no
complaints, downplays accomplishments, trustworthy
Jan –
CFO — Stickler for detail
Nick –
COO — Star, but prideful
Joseph
Charles – New VP of Marketing
This was
once a very dysfunctional team, but Kathryn has come in and made all the
difference in the world. How did she
know it was a dysfunctional team. Well,
let’s look at the five dysfunctions she recognized (and fixed).
1. Absence
of Trust
Kathryn recognized
the absence of trust and the outset of her first meeting. There was a lack of debate. People were not willing to throw their views
and opinions out into a meeting in fear of those ideas being shot down. I wonder if I trust my colleagues, since I’m
so slow to speak sometimes.
To overcome
the absence of trust, Kathryn had everyone take a personality test. I find personality tests intriguing. Somehow they seem to get me just right. Then, everyone shared some information about
themselves. It was important for people
to know each other. If we don’t know
each other, how can we trust each other.
I believe
that one of the hardest parts for me would be when Kathryn asked people to
share their strengths and weaknesses in front of everyone else. Well, here’s my confession to the world - I
like my box. I’m not comfortable
throwing myself out there. I’m not very
technical. I don’t understand somethings
that people say. However, I learn. If there’s something I don’t know - a word I
hear that I don’t yet understand - I find out.
I’m curious. I’m hands on. I’m a good thinker. I’m a people person. I’m a good listener. Now you know a little about me. What about you? What kind of person are you? What are YOUR strengths…. YOUR
weaknesses? Let’s get rid of our lack of
trust.
When we
trust each other, we no longer have to be invulnerable. We can be weak - imperfect - and that’s
okay. I don’t have to be seen as perfect
- though I carry that box around all the time (The Anatomy of Peace talks more
about this). I need to trust that even
if I’m not perfect, people will still like me for me.
2.
Inattention to Results
Kathryn
recognized that the team didn’t focus on results. Each individual was just that - an
individual. Nothing else mattered to each
person except for his/her own personal success.
She told the
story of a young man who starred on a basketball team, but didn’t care if the
team won or loss, so long as his stats were nicely padded. He eventually quit the team, when the coach
kept pushing for teamwork. It wasn’t for
him. It’s important for the team to want
to win badly - together.
It all comes
down to goal setting, metrics and results then.
If we aren’t setting goals as a team, analyzing our progress and
celebrating our results (or learning from our failures) we are not working
together. How can we go as a team to a
destination we don’t recognize?
3. Fear of
Conflict
Let’s be
honest here. I don’t like conflict. I struggle with it. I don’t think anybody really loves it. However, since I read this book, I’ve some to
appreciateconstructive conflict for what it is.
It’s better to have constructive conflict than to pretend like
everything is okay.
I recently
has some grievances to air with one of my superiors. It had sat and festered for some 3
weeks. He wouldn’t look me in the eye, I
didn’t care to talk to him. After
reading this book, I set up a time to sit down and talk with him. Now THAT was hard. It’s really uncomfortable to approach someone
when you’ve been letting something fester like we had.
When I first
started talking, he kind of laughed it off, saying that he hadn’t noticed any
tension between us. However, as the
conversation progressed, he recognized that we had conflict and that it was
hurting our (or at least my) productivity.
I explained the things he did that made me feel like he didn’t trust me
and the things he said that hurt me. We
left with a mutual understanding of things we could do a little better. Since then, conflict with him has been
minimal.
Why not
suffer through a little pain in removing the sliver, rather than the sliver
causing an infection, rubbing raw, and filling with puss? It’s just not worth it.
I now speak
up in meetings. If people oppose me,
that’s fine - it’s not a personal attack.
I challenge people’s ideas. I
encourage thinking about things in a different light. I actually increase conflict, and it’s
satisfying. We all learn and are more
productive for it.
4. Lack of Commitment
It’s nearly
impossible to get anything done as a team when there is a lack of
commitment. Again… if we don’t know our
destination, how can we get there as a team.
Kathryn saw this in her team as an ambiguity in results, in requirements
and in expectations for the team. In
order to be an effective team, we all need to be on the same page.
5. Avoiding Accountability
Kathryn saw
low standards in her team. This she
recognized as the team trying to avoid accountability. If we’re willing to accept accountability for
our actions, we will set high standards for ourselves (or our teams) and hold
true to those standards. If we are doing
what we should be, we set high standards for ourselves. How high are your standards? Do you accept accountability for your
actions? Set those high standards. Reach the next level. As a team, we must not avoid accountability,
but rather embrace it, for it will drive us to see sights we have not yet
beheld.
I did a
short assessment at the end of the book relating to two teams I am on.
Team 1
results:
1. Trust – 4
2. Conflict – 7
3. Commitment – 7
4. Accountability – 4
5. Results – 8
Team 2
results:
1. Trust – 7
2. Conflict – 5
3. Commitment – 8
4. Accountability – 8
5. Results – 6
I can
recognize now that with Team 1, I just don’t trust them enough. I’ve been improving my relationship with this
team, and it’s making a difference. I’m
not seeing the effects that I saw initially.
With Team 2,
there is a great fear of conflict. It’s
a team that knows each other well, but doesn’t want to hurt each other. Conflict is seen as destructive instead of
constructive. To make this team
functional. We need to work toward a
common goal of being able to give conflict without personal feelings being
passed in the envelope as well.
It’s a
learning process. It may take years and
years - but at least I know the starting point.
I know where to go from here.
I encourage
you to read this book - find out about your teams… how can YOU make the
difference?
(Note: This post was originally written several months ago)
Have you read this book? What were your thoughts?
Have you read this book? What were your thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment